www.nycsubway.org

Re: MVM's Run Windows (2 Pics ~170k) (605493)

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

Posted by johnl on Mon Nov 17 16:33:13 2003, in response to Re: MVM's Run Windows (2 Pics ~170k),
posted by Dan Lawrence on Mon Nov 17 15:46:30 2003.

From my personal experience:

98 collapses easily under pressure, and has memory leaks
NT is better, but suffers from the blue screen too often
ME no experience
2000 getting better. Can stay up for weeks at a time
XP seems to be quite reliable. Don’t have sufficient info yet

But the winner by a huge margin:

Linux (RH 7.1) Up for over a year, running a web server and Gimps in the background, so the processor was running flat out. The end failure was hardware: the building that contains the machine has terrible power, and the battery in the UPS system died.

I would never put anything that was life-mission critical, such as a signalling system on any operating system that came out of Redmond.


Responses

Replying to posts on SubTalk are disabled at this time.