Re: Proof that the Lex can’t support more than 28 tph (504927)

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread ]

Posted by Larry Littlefield on Sun Jun 1 19:45:55 2003, in response to Re: Proof that the Lex can’t support more than 28 tph,
posted by Peter Rosa on Sun Jun 1 19:16:20 2003.

You have to have a lot of patience to find yourself on Google if you aren't famous. I tried to look into myself, but all I got was a school superintendent in Maine are various Larry Littlefields who were accused of various crimes. I doubt you'd find anyone's credentials on Google. Not a fair test.
I wouldn't say Mr. Bauman doesn't know what he is talking about. I would say, instead, that those who run the system everyday do know what they are talking about. Lots has changed since more TPH were run, including risk tolerance and willingless to rely on fallable humans. We've talked about the need for that third track on the Jamaica. Think we could get away with just putting a track in over a few weeks, going with line of sight operating, and putting in signals later? NOT!

(There are no responses to this message.)

Re: Proof that the Lex can’t support more than 28 tph (504927)

Replying to posts on SubTalk are disabled at this time.