Re: Proof that the Lex can’t support more than 28 tph (504645)

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread ]

Posted by RonInBayside on Sun Jun 1 08:29:20 2003, in response to Re: Proof that the Lex can’t support more than 28 tph,
posted by Stephen Bauman on Sun Jun 1 07:28:54 2003.

"Admittedly, such indirect evidence is not as satisfying something more direct. However, that is all one has to go on for contemporary published data collected by the BOT/TA. Your skepticism of the reliability of those schedules, while healthy, is based on even less documentation."
His skepticism is based on the unreliability of the BOT reports, which is reasonable. If the reports were the gospel you take them to be, David Gunn would not have had to take the action he did. You need to document your confidence adequately - the burden of proof is on you, not him.

(There are no responses to this message.)

Re: Proof that the Lex can’t support more than 28 tph (504645)

Replying to posts on SubTalk are disabled at this time.