I think it is you who doesn't pay attention to what is posted - even if it was you who posted it. What you actually said was, "They match up better against any other B division equipment and most A division equipment. R-68/A's are alow peices of crap, and the R-46/44's are not the best MDBF performers."
You implied that the R-32 outperforms the the R-68 and the R-46 which is simply not supported by the operating statistics. This brings us to your other point. If your criteria for a great car is that you can see the speedometer through the crack in the cab door hinge or that it has a railfan window, well then, I must nominate you for the 2001 Salaam-LaLa award.